coverswera.blogg.se

EEOC v. Market Burgers, L.L.C., d/b/a Checkers, Civil Action No. 13-cv-4651
EEOC v. Market Burgers, L.L.C., d/b/a Checkers, Civil Action No. 13-cv-4651





EEOC v. Market Burgers, L.L.C., d/b/a Checkers, Civil Action No. 13-cv-4651 EEOC v. Market Burgers, L.L.C., d/b/a Checkers, Civil Action No. 13-cv-4651

“We are very pleased that Rover’s Place worked collaboratively with the EEOC to craft a compre­hensive settlement,” said Gregory Gochanour, regional attorney for the EEOC’s Chicago District Office.

EEOC v. Market Burgers, L.L.C., d/b/a Checkers, Civil Action No. 13-cv-4651

The case was litigated by Trial Attorneys Hannah Henkel and Miles Shultz and Supervisory Trial Attorney Ethan Cohen. District Court for the Norther District of Illinois after first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement via its concil­iation process. Such alleged conducted violates the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The owner then confronted the employee and in an abusive manner inquired about his history of addiction and treatment even though the employee was not currently using drugs and had not presented any issue in the workplace because of his former drug use. The EEOC charged alleging that Rover’s Place subjected an employee to a hostile work environment, inquired into his medical history, and forced him to quit his job because of his opioid addiction disability.Īccording to the EEOC’s lawsuit, the employee worked without incident at Rover’s Place until one of the owner’s learned of his past drug use. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the federal agency announced today. CHICAGO – A dog kennel company in suburban Chicago, Rover’s Place, will pay $60,000 and furnish other relief to settle a lawsuit brought by the U.S.







EEOC v. Market Burgers, L.L.C., d/b/a Checkers, Civil Action No. 13-cv-4651